224 / 2024-09-11 20:11:25
How Indonesian Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are doing: A management performance-based evaluation
Aichi targets,area-based management,management effectiveness,marine protected areas,Indonesia,post-2020 global biodiversity framework
Session 48 - Ecological and Socio-Economic Benefits of Marine Protected Areas
Abstract Accepted
Lusita Meilana / Center for Coastal and Marine Resources Studies (CCRMS), International Research Institute for Maritime, Ocean and Fisheries (i-MAR), IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia
Qinhua Fang / Coastal and Ocean Management Institute, Xiamen University, 361102, China
Handoko Adi Susanto / Arafura and Timor Seas Ecosystem Action (ATSEA) Programme
Ririn Widiastutik / Directorate General for Marine Spatial Management, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Jakarta, Indonesia
Dedy Eka Syaputra / Directorate General for Marine Spatial Management, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Jakarta, Indonesia
Ikhumhen Harrison Odion / Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Coastal Wetland Ecosystems, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Fujian 361102, China
Rusdatus Sholihah / Directorate General for Marine Spatial Management, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Jakarta, Indonesia
Amehr Hakim / Directorate General for Marine Spatial Management, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Jakarta, Indonesia
Suzhen Yang / Xiamen Key Laboratory of Urban Sea Ecological Conservation and Restoration (USER), Xiamen University, 361102, China
Zhenghua Liu / Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, 178 Daxue Road, Siming District, Xiamen, Fujian Province, China
According to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) post-2020 global biodiversity framework, marine conservation activities aiming solely at area coverage are insufficient; thus, a persistent effort is required to establish effective marine protected areas (MPAs). Despite the fact that the number of MPAs has expanded dramatically over time, their management effectiveness still needs to improve, particularly in developing nations. Hence, this study was conducted to quantitatively and qualitatively assess the current state of Indonesian MPAs in meeting the Aichi targets. The government's investigative reports served as the foundation for the quantitative research, while a government-led interview-based survey conducted across 61 Indonesian locations served as the basis for the qualitative study. The findings showed that although the present Indonesian MPAs were at the stage of meeting the national target of 10% coverage, it was anticipated that they would fall short of the new 30% worldwide target by 2030. Although 61% and 39% of the research sites were managed at a minimal and optimal level, respectively, the evaluation of the management effectiveness of the MPAs in Indonesia indicates that none of the sites were sustainably managed. Lack of funding due to a need for infrastructure, facilities, and human resources was the main problem impeding management effectiveness. Based on the study's findings, it is recommended that the nation's biodiversity targets be designed to focus more on the development and oversight of the current MPA management and provide a perceptive policy response concerning the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. This study sheds light on how crucial it is to comprehend the current difficulties and enhance tactics for achieving "successful" management.